Contributions

Voir cette page en Français

Deadline for submissions: April 1, 2010

Edited by: Phillip Rousseau and Kiven Strohm

This issue of Altérités aims to address recent efforts to reconfigure the ethnographic in anthropology and across its manifold uses and questionings within other academic fields and among contemporary social and cultural practices. While recent years have been particularly fertile with respect to the revaluation of the place, role and form of the ethnographic, these reflections have tended to focus on developments solely within anthropology. Our goal is to address the problem of the ethnographic beyond this disciplinary framework. Three lines of thought are particularly apt for laying the groundwork for the reinsertion of the ethnographic within a broader context:

1. To address the changes that have affected ethnographic work in recent years and how these reconfigurations are part of the anthropological field (i.e., the rise of the importance of collaboration, as well as other more specific conceptualizations such as the para-ethnographic and the "collaboratory", etc.).

2. To illustrate and consider the various borrowings and uses by other disciplines and social practices of the ethnographic. While art practice and business marketing seem particularly amenable to such methodological borrowing, political science and even the military equally draw on the ethnographic as a means to an end. It is necessary, therefore, to explore the role and place of the "ethnographic" in non-anthropological contexts.

3. To confront recent epistemological reformulations that seem unique to anthropology with reflections from other disciplines and fields. The relationship between researcher and informant is at the heart of any attempt to reconfigure the ethnographic (including the problem of representation of one by the other), hence the importance given to such concepts as collaboration, participation, intervention, intersubjectivity, communication, etc.. If these concepts are at the heart of attempts to overhaul contemporary ethnography within anthropology, they also seem to be a focus that can be found outside of it. In art and advertising, for example, relational art or "collaborative marketing" are also attempts at a convergence between two poles traditionally perceived as being separate and distinct (artist/spectator, transmitter/receiver, etc.). However, the attempt to minimize such distances recalls recent anthropological efforts to bridge the gap between researcher and informant. Are these non-anthropological reconfigurations comparable to recent developments in anthropology and, if so, how? Do such efforts have something to contribute to anthropology or is there need for caution?

While the first line of thought seeks to reinvigorate an epistemological debate within anthropology, the final two are intended as an open invitation to non-anthropologists to place similar reflections from diverse fields side by side. The juxtaposition of these three lines of thought will allow us to establish an account of the ethnographic that we hope will be, if not exhaustive, at least expanded. Ideally, this juxtaposition will lead to a better understanding of current disciplinary predicaments by comparing the epistemological and methodological upheavals unique to anthropology in the light of an overflowing contemporaneity.

(Click HERE to download a PDF version of the call for papers.)

Please send an electronic copy of your text and abstracts to comite@alterites.ca and alterites@umontreal.ca.

Presentation rules for submitted texts can be consulted at our website: http://www.alterites.ca/politique-en.html.

Altérités Altérités accepts texts in both English and French.

Top of Page

Before submitting a critical review, please send us the complete bibliographic reference of the book you have selected via e-mail to comite@alterites.ca.

The critical review should briefly present the principal arguments of the book and offer a critical analysis of the work in question. It should position the book within the disciplinary and/or thematic debates and highlight its theoretical and methodological contributions, the quality of its writing, and the general contributions it makes to the field. We suggest shorter quotations, and keeping the number of references to a minimum.

For reviews of books written by a collective, you must present the general subject matter and focus only on those contributions and details that you found relevant.

Critical reviews should be between 750 and 1200 words.

Top of Page

Bibliographical Essays

Before submitting a bibliographic essay, please send us the theme and the complete bibliographic references which will be used, via e-mail to comite@alterites.ca.

The bibliographic essay must present a critical discussion regarding a topic (or an author) by focusing on the perspectives, the authors and the main issues being addressed.

Bibliographic essays should be between 1500 and 2000 words.

Top of Page

publishes for the most part special topic issues. However, we encourage the submission of articles that may be not only fall outside the proposed theme, but also outside of the strict disciplinary structures of anthropology. Papers that will be considered for publication include critical essays referring to a film, the work or an artist or any other type of media. They should focus on the issues that are currently being discussed in contemporary anthropologic. They could also be in form of essays presenting a viewpoint on the same issues while stemming from other fields of study, or in other formats than that of written text, such as visual or auditory essays.

These papers can be submitted at all times and their publication will be conditional on evaluation by the Editorial Committee and by external referees. Regarding the decision to publish essays in multimedia formats, the technical limits related to the capacity of the journal’s website will also be taken into consideration. Before submitting your essays in multimedia formats, please contact us at comite@alterites.ca to provide us with a description of your work.

Top of Page